PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-26.84%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-32.02%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-46.07%
Negative EBIT growth while 0360.HK is at 90.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-46.07%
Negative operating income growth while 0360.HK is at 91.74%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-92.78%
Negative net income growth while 0360.HK stands at 80.61%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-92.42%
Negative EPS growth while 0360.HK is at 81.25%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-92.54%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0360.HK is at 81.25%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.68%
Share reduction while 0360.HK is at 0.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above 0360.HK's 0.00%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
68.58%
Dividend growth of 68.58% while 0360.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-13.62%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-10.58%
Negative FCF growth while 0360.HK is at 88.68%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-76.95%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-60.58%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-45.66%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-239.91%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
39.42%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
3.16%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0360.HK's 114.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-98.14%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0360.HK is at 89.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
132.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 83.38%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
107.44%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0360.HK's 81.91%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
-6.40%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-18.28%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
0.48%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-3.24%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
20.32%
Dividend/share CAGR of 20.32% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
86.50%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 86.50% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-29.36%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
3.59%
Inventory growth well above 0360.HK's 6.09%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-11.27%
Negative asset growth while 0360.HK invests at 1.85%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.58%
Under 50% of 0360.HK's 2.29%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
26.20%
Debt growth far above 0360.HK's 10.89%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-29.26%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-31.82%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.