PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.44%
Positive revenue growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.98%
Positive gross profit growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-0.35%
Negative EBIT growth while 0376.HK is at 4.24%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.35%
Negative operating income growth while 0376.HK is at 248.89%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
2991.74%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 34.23%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
2880.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 34.10%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
2860.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 34.10%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.27%
Share count expansion well above 0376.HK's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 0376.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
100.00%
Positive OCF growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
100.00%
Positive FCF growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-66.05%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-69.39%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-49.38%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 153.62%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
100.00%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
100.00%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
36.90%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
125.08%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 29.75%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1534.11%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 402.41%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
19.37%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with 0376.HK's 19.71%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
-6.83%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-3.85%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0376.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
14.65%
AR growth of 14.65% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-19.50%
Inventory is declining while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.10%
Similar asset growth to 0376.HK's 2.97%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
2.88%
Positive BV/share change while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
83.53%
Debt growth far above 0376.HK's 0.18%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
18.55%
R&D growth of 18.55% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-5.63%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.