PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-37.54%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-12.80%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
92.45%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 4.24%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
92.43%
Operating income growth under 50% of 0376.HK's 248.89%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
82.70%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 34.23%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
82.62%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 34.10%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
82.62%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 34.10%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73.32%
Positive OCF growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
71.94%
Positive FCF growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
24.92%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
24.92%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
24.92%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
46.64%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0376.HK's 153.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
46.64%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
46.64%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
65.40%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
65.40%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 29.75%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
65.40%
Below 50% of 0376.HK's 402.41%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.55%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.