0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-30.74%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-30.74%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
67.30%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 4.24%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
67.30%
Operating income growth under 50% of 0376.HK's 248.89%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
49.84%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x 0376.HK's 34.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
49.69%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x 0376.HK's 34.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
49.69%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x 0376.HK's 34.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-116.41%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-116.64%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-63.43%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-63.43%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-63.43%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
67.31%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0376.HK's 153.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
67.31%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
67.31%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
56.93%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
56.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 29.75%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
56.93%
Below 50% of 0376.HK's 402.41%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.99%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.