0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Positive revenue growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.00%
Positive gross profit growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.00%
EBIT growth of 0.00% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
0.00%
Operating income growth under 50% of 0376.HK's 72.03%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-0.00%
Negative net income growth while 0376.HK stands at 72.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
1.16%
EPS growth under 50% of 0376.HK's 75.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
1.16%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 0376.HK's 75.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.02%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 21.70%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-42.02%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 21.70%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-76.79%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 21.70%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-32.81%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 112.37%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-32.81%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK is at 112.37%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-24.45%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 112.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
54.36%
Similar net income/share CAGR to 0376.HK's 49.83%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
54.36%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to 0376.HK's 49.83%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
34.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of 0376.HK's 49.83%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
SG&A growth of 0.00% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.