0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
50.07%
Positive revenue growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-10.89%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-1059.04%
Negative EBIT growth while 0376.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1059.06%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-36.72%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-34.78%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-34.78%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-118.36%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-118.85%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-55.48%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-64.36%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
21.73%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
85.56%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 39.59%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
72.93%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 39.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
55.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0376.HK's 39.59%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
83.18%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 48.52% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
51.38%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to 0376.HK's 48.52%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
60.94%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0376.HK's 48.52%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.39%
SG&A growth of 32.39% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.