PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth of 0.00% while 0376.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-285.03%
Negative EBIT growth while 0376.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.93%
Negative EPS growth while 0376.HK is at 3.57%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-114.93%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0376.HK is at 3.57%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
135.43%
Slight or no buybacks while 0376.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
135.43%
Slight or no buyback while 0376.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.21%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 71.18%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-12.15%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 71.18%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
60.03%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0376.HK's 40.66%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
65.71%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of 0376.HK's 73.07%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
-108.61%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK is at 73.07%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
74.18%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
165.46%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 26.94% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
138.12%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 26.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
243.43%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
344.28%
SG&A growth of 344.28% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.