0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.46%
Operating income growth of 77.46% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
-114.93%
Negative net income growth while 0376.HK stands at 23.01%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-114.99%
Negative EPS growth while 0376.HK is at 19.78%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-114.99%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0376.HK is at 19.78%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16816.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 305.26%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
13431.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 274.30%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
214.53%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 28.07%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1724.05%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 115.42%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1810.30%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 112.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
899.55%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 151.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
20.09%
Below 50% of 0376.HK's 111.84%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
53.15%
Below 50% of 0376.HK's 111.50%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-129.65%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK is 106.24%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.51%
Inventory growth of 37.51% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
9.93%
Asset growth well under 50% of 0376.HK's 70.52%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.05%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 2.33%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
79.24%
We have some new debt while 0376.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.