PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.40%
Negative revenue growth while 0376.HK stands at 58.16%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-10.04%
Negative gross profit growth while 0376.HK is at 58.16%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-19.66%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-49.68%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
600.81%
Positive net income growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
542.31%
Positive EPS growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
542.31%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
12.62%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0376.HK's 287.99%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
12.62%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 0376.HK's 287.99%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-89.20%
Dividend reduction while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-90.38%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-143.76%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
34936.19%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
16839.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
11.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0376.HK's 47.63%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-62.82%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 83.79%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
283.50%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-96.14%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 21.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
204.83%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 94.56% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
59.56%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0376.HK's 85.11%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
-27.41%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK is 88.71%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.98%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0376.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0376.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-32.62%
Inventory is declining while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-6.91%
Negative asset growth while 0376.HK invests at 13.11%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
6.12%
Under 50% of 0376.HK's 73.34%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
62.93%
Debt growth of 62.93% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.04%
We cut SG&A while 0376.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.