PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.69%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0376.HK's 110.73%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
27.08%
Positive gross profit growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-3.63%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-26.39%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
3008.70%
Positive net income growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2827.27%
Positive EPS growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2827.27%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
3.02%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0376.HK's 221.02%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
3.02%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 0376.HK's 221.02%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-52.42%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
2536.42%
Positive OCF growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
1701.27%
Positive FCF growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
53271.44%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
189.85%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-15.26%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
5898.47%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 88.30%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
2081.08%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 21.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
604.15%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 4.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
300.18%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 83.41% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-7.74%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0376.HK is 85.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-35.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK is 39.83%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.28%
Equity/share CAGR of 245.28% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.11%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0376.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0376.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
1.95%
Inventory growth of 1.95% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
23.69%
Positive asset growth while 0376.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-1.08%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-35.87%
We’re deleveraging while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-100.00%
Our R&D shrinks while 0376.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
34.88%
SG&A growth of 34.88% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.