0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.83%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0376.HK's 16.93%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
2.90%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0376.HK's 199.52%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
6.20%
EBIT growth below 50% of 0376.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
35.35%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 4.89%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-19.07%
Negative net income growth while 0376.HK stands at 4.14%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-9.25%
Negative EPS growth while 0376.HK is at 3.54%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-5.78%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0376.HK is at 3.54%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-10.94%
Share reduction while 0376.HK is at 0.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-14.43%
Reduced diluted shares while 0376.HK is at 0.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
349.14%
Dividend growth of 349.14% while 0376.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-29.11%
Negative OCF growth while 0376.HK is at 15.97%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-271.62%
Negative FCF growth while 0376.HK is at 16.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
82239.74%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
44.10%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 12.75%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
12.96%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
565.21%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 90.22%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-83.91%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK is at 52.52%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-64.35%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
467.39%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 84.36% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-50.51%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0376.HK is 67.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-54.74%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.46%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to 0376.HK's 114.32%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.68%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-88.67%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0376.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.99%
Inventory is declining while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.78%
Negative asset growth while 0376.HK invests at 31.60%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
18.40%
75-90% of 0376.HK's 21.10%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-30.04%
We’re deleveraging while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.76%
We cut SG&A while 0376.HK invests at 321.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.