PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.54%
Positive revenue growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-15.02%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-30.53%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-30.53%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
2.50%
Positive net income growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
0.99%
Positive EPS growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
-4.19%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.44%
Share count expansion well above 0376.HK's 0.87%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
7.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above 0376.HK's 0.87%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.94%
Positive OCF growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
37.76%
Positive FCF growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
247.66%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
19.94%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-10.19%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-6520.63%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 81.89%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-394.38%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK is at 77.01%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-261.16%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 72.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
17.38%
Below 50% of 0376.HK's 88.57%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
27.23%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0376.HK's 22.21%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
59.09%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 2.84%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.28%
Below 50% of 0376.HK's 239.96%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
6.65%
Below 50% of 0376.HK's 387.87%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
578.71%
Dividend/share CAGR of 578.71% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
120.50%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 120.50% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
44.39%
AR growth of 44.39% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-44.69%
Inventory is declining while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
14.57%
Positive asset growth while 0376.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.88%
Positive BV/share change while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
206.46%
Debt shrinking faster vs. 0376.HK's 920.43%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-36.19%
Our R&D shrinks while 0376.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-4.02%
We cut SG&A while 0376.HK invests at 22.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.