PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
39.61%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0376.HK's 1342.49%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
17.91%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0376.HK's 1342.49%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
66.33%
EBIT growth 50-75% of 0376.HK's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
66.33%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of 0376.HK's 113.59%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
-47.50%
Negative net income growth while 0376.HK stands at 94.99%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-11.19%
Negative EPS growth while 0376.HK is at 95.50%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-47.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0376.HK is at 95.38%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-40.81%
Share reduction while 0376.HK is at 11.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
33.34%
OCF growth under 50% of 0376.HK's 142.24%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
22.09%
FCF growth under 50% of 0376.HK's 131.91%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
30.51%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0376.HK's 464.94%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-1.91%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 142.64%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
16.37%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0376.HK's 763.93%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-267.39%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 110.91%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-307.51%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK is at 125.25%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
34.33%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
135.80%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0376.HK's 98.86%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
97.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to 0376.HK's 96.49%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
-59.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK is 96.44%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
418.24%
Equity/share CAGR of 418.24% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
52.20%
Below 50% of 0376.HK's 832.02%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
23.32%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.76%
AR growth of 2.76% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-3.93%
Inventory is declining while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.51%
Asset growth well under 50% of 0376.HK's 1180.22%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
69.47%
Under 50% of 0376.HK's 247.61%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-22.54%
We’re deleveraging while 0376.HK stands at 6317.13%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
97.36%
R&D growth of 97.36% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
9.83%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0376.HK's 23.65%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.