Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)

Negative EBIT growth while 0376.HK is at 78.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.

Negative operating income growth while 0376.HK is at 53.12%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.

Negative net income growth while 0376.HK stands at 111.73%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while 0376.HK is at 110.55%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while 0376.HK is at 110.55%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

Share count expansion well above 0376.HK's 0.32%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.

Negative OCF growth while 0376.HK is at 37.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.

Negative FCF growth while 0376.HK is at 37.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 1468.66%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 2371.80%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 341.58%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK is at 547.04%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.

3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0376.HK's 1840.57%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.

Below 50% of 0376.HK's 126.12%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.

Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK is 235.06%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.

5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0376.HK's 38.87%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0376.HK is at 69.53%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.

Cut dividends over 10 years while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

AR growth of 82.29% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.

Inventory growth of 0.89% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.

Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.

Debt growth far above 0376.HK's 77.45%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.

R&D growth of 435.21% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.

SG&A growth well above 0376.HK's 13.61%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.