Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)

Negative revenue growth while 0376.HK stands at 11.73%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Negative gross profit growth while 0376.HK is at 11.73%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Dividend reduction while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.

Negative OCF growth while 0376.HK is at 45.84%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.

Negative FCF growth while 0376.HK is at 45.88%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 371.95%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Negative 5Y CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 560.96%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 6482.93%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 461.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK is at 47.53%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 1708.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0376.HK is 129.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK is 134.82%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.

10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0376.HK's 189.79%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0376.HK is at 49.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0376.HK is at 81.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.

Cut dividends over 10 years while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.

Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.

Negative near-term dividend growth while 0376.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.

Firm’s AR is declining while 0376.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.

Inventory growth of 22.07% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.

We have a declining book value while 0376.HK shows 2.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.

Debt growth far above 0376.HK's 15.03%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.

Our R&D shrinks while 0376.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.