PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.16%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0376.HK's 13.86%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
20.10%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x 0376.HK's 13.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
8.18%
Positive EBIT growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
8.18%
Positive operating income growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
85.09%
Positive net income growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
84.38%
Positive EPS growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
85.94%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-6.85%
Share reduction while 0376.HK is at 0.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
1.22%
Diluted share count expanding well above 0376.HK's 0.39%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
6.96%
Dividend growth of 6.96% while 0376.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-10.98%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-15.47%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-35.10%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 1187.40%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-46.64%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 2980.65%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-44.46%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 236.43%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-8146.73%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 359.08%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
36.76%
Below 50% of 0376.HK's 2572.37%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-85.39%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 1768.74%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-196.54%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0376.HK is at 143.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-102.54%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0376.HK is 134.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-108.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK is 488.97%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
88.86%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0376.HK's 65.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
-3.72%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0376.HK is at 91.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-12.03%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0376.HK is at 0.11%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-18.72%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.37%
AR growth of 1.37% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
20.84%
Inventory growth of 20.84% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.58%
Asset growth well under 50% of 0376.HK's 5.66%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.91%
Positive BV/share change while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-3.03%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
146.15%
R&D growth of 146.15% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-18.01%
We cut SG&A while 0376.HK invests at 22.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.