PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.99%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0376.HK's 12.29%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
52.56%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 13.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
90.29%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 37.98%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
90.29%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 37.98%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
1343.52%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 87.94%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
1220.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 87.15%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
1240.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 87.15%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.83%
Share count expansion well above 0376.HK's 0.39%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.00%
Reduced diluted shares while 0376.HK is at 0.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.60%
Dividend reduction while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
13.50%
Positive OCF growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
11.76%
Positive FCF growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-62.99%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 465.28%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-62.26%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 132.97%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-48.38%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-373.36%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-31.73%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
37.34%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
9.63%
Below 50% of 0376.HK's 165.68%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-44.38%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0376.HK is 1971.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-87.71%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
25.71%
Below 50% of 0376.HK's 648.06%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-17.40%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
21.45%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.32%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 9.32% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-4.88%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0376.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-27.62%
Inventory is declining while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-4.57%
Negative asset growth while 0376.HK invests at 4.98%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.89%
Positive BV/share change while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
4.18%
We have some new debt while 0376.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
47.15%
R&D growth of 47.15% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
51.97%
SG&A growth of 51.97% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.