PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.44%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0425.HK's 8.71%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
1.98%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0425.HK's 11.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-0.35%
Negative EBIT growth while 0425.HK is at 19.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.35%
Negative operating income growth while 0425.HK is at 19.85%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
2991.74%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 17.12%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
2880.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 17.20%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
2860.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 17.20%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.27%
Slight or no buybacks while 0425.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.00%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0425.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
100.00%
Positive OCF growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
100.00%
Positive FCF growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-66.05%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 228.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-69.39%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 71.63%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-49.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 67.79%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
100.00%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
100.00%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
36.90%
Below 50% of 0425.HK's 116.89%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
125.08%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0425.HK's 58.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1534.11%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0425.HK's 112.29%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
19.37%
Below 50% of 0425.HK's 137.48%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-6.83%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0425.HK is at 43.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-3.85%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0425.HK is at 28.91%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
14.65%
AR growth well above 0425.HK's 15.84%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-19.50%
Inventory is declining while 0425.HK stands at 11.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.10%
Asset growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 0.47%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.88%
Under 50% of 0425.HK's 5.86%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
83.53%
We have some new debt while 0425.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
18.55%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. 0425.HK's 2.83%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-5.63%
We cut SG&A while 0425.HK invests at 9.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.