0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-37.54%
Negative revenue growth while 0425.HK stands at 8.71%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-12.80%
Negative gross profit growth while 0425.HK is at 11.85%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
92.45%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 19.85%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
92.43%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 19.85%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
82.70%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 17.12%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
82.62%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 17.20%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
82.62%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 17.20%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73.32%
Positive OCF growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
71.94%
Positive FCF growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
24.92%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0425.HK's 228.55%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
24.92%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0425.HK's 71.63%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
24.92%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0425.HK's 67.79%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
46.64%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
46.64%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
46.64%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
65.40%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0425.HK's 116.89%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
65.40%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0425.HK's 58.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
65.40%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of 0425.HK's 112.29%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.55%
We cut SG&A while 0425.HK invests at 9.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.