0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-57.73%
Negative revenue growth while 0425.HK stands at 8.71%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-57.73%
Negative gross profit growth while 0425.HK is at 11.85%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-513.63%
Negative EBIT growth while 0425.HK is at 19.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-513.63%
Negative operating income growth while 0425.HK is at 19.85%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-238.98%
Negative net income growth while 0425.HK stands at 17.12%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-239.53%
Negative EPS growth while 0425.HK is at 17.20%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-239.53%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0425.HK is at 17.20%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
473.30%
Positive OCF growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
434.86%
Positive FCF growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-47.19%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 228.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-47.19%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 71.63%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-47.19%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 67.79%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
299.19%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
299.19%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
299.19%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-17.28%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0425.HK is at 116.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-17.28%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0425.HK is 58.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-17.28%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0425.HK is 112.29%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.40%
We cut SG&A while 0425.HK invests at 9.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.