0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0425.HK's 8.71%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.00%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0425.HK's 11.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
0.00%
EBIT growth below 50% of 0425.HK's 19.85%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-0.00%
Negative operating income growth while 0425.HK is at 19.85%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
26.79%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 17.12%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
26.48%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 17.20%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
26.48%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 17.20%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
Positive FCF growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
5.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0425.HK's 228.55%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
5.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0425.HK's 71.63%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
5.62%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0425.HK's 67.79%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
498.39%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
498.39%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
498.39%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-71.73%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0425.HK is at 116.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-71.73%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0425.HK is 58.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-71.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0425.HK is 112.29%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0425.HK's 9.68%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.