0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-30.74%
Negative revenue growth while 0425.HK stands at 8.71%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-30.74%
Negative gross profit growth while 0425.HK is at 11.85%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
67.30%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 19.85%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
67.30%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 19.85%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
49.84%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 17.12%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
49.69%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 17.20%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
49.69%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 17.20%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-116.41%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-116.64%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-63.43%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 228.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-63.43%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 71.63%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-63.43%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 67.79%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
67.31%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
67.31%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
67.31%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
56.93%
Below 50% of 0425.HK's 116.89%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
56.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to 0425.HK's 58.10%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
56.93%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of 0425.HK's 112.29%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.99%
We cut SG&A while 0425.HK invests at 9.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.