PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Positive revenue growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.00%
Positive gross profit growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.01%
EBIT growth of 0.01% while 0425.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
0.00%
Positive operating income growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
OCF growth under 50% of 0425.HK's 143.24%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
0.00%
FCF growth under 50% of 0425.HK's 167.73%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-40.67%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 41.75%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-52.50%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 41.75%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-43.82%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 41.75%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
257.34%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0425.HK's 371.70%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
394.87%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to 0425.HK's 371.70%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
-60.50%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 371.70%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
75.39%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0425.HK's 32.70% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
28.87%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of 0425.HK's 32.70%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
85.67%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0425.HK's 32.70%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
We expand SG&A while 0425.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.