0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
50.07%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of 0425.HK's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
-10.89%
Negative gross profit growth while 0425.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1059.04%
Negative EBIT growth while 0425.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1059.06%
Negative operating income growth while 0425.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-36.72%
Negative net income growth while 0425.HK stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-34.78%
Negative EPS growth while 0425.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-34.78%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0425.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-118.36%
Negative OCF growth while 0425.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-118.85%
Negative FCF growth while 0425.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-55.48%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 41.75%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-64.36%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 41.75%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
21.73%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0425.HK's 41.75%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
85.56%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0425.HK's 371.70%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
72.93%
Below 50% of 0425.HK's 371.70%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
55.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0425.HK's 371.70%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
83.18%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0425.HK's 32.70% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
51.38%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0425.HK's 32.70%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
60.94%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0425.HK's 32.70%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.39%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0425.HK's 100.00%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.