PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth of 0.00% while 0425.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-285.03%
Negative EBIT growth while 0425.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.93%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-114.93%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
135.43%
Share change of 135.43% while 0425.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
135.43%
Diluted share change of 135.43% while 0425.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.21%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 198.30%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-12.15%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 198.30%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
60.03%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0425.HK's 198.30%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
65.71%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0425.HK's 616.41%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-108.61%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK is at 616.41%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
74.18%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0425.HK's 616.41%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
165.46%
Similar net income/share CAGR to 0425.HK's 175.19%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
138.12%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of 0425.HK's 175.19%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
243.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0425.HK's 175.19%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
344.28%
SG&A growth of 344.28% while 0425.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.