0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.46%
Positive operating income growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-114.93%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-114.99%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-114.99%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16816.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0425.HK's 829.25%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
13431.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0425.HK's 227.77%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
214.53%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0425.HK's 126.58%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1724.05%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with 0425.HK's 1677.42%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
1810.30%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0425.HK's 88.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
899.55%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0425.HK's 133.51%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
20.09%
Below 50% of 0425.HK's 533.52%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
53.15%
Below 50% of 0425.HK's 138.71%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-129.65%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0425.HK is 85.51%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.51%
We show growth while 0425.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
9.93%
Similar asset growth to 0425.HK's 9.87%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
5.05%
Similar to 0425.HK's 5.16%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
79.24%
Debt growth far above 0425.HK's 6.28%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.