0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.40%
Negative revenue growth while 0425.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-10.04%
Negative gross profit growth while 0425.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-19.66%
Negative EBIT growth while 0425.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-49.68%
Negative operating income growth while 0425.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
600.81%
Net income growth of 600.81% while 0425.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
542.31%
EPS growth of 542.31% while 0425.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
542.31%
Diluted EPS growth of 542.31% while 0425.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
12.62%
Share change of 12.62% while 0425.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
12.62%
Diluted share change of 12.62% while 0425.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-89.20%
Dividend reduction while 0425.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-90.38%
Negative OCF growth while 0425.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-143.76%
Negative FCF growth while 0425.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
34936.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0425.HK's 364.62%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
16839.70%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0425.HK's 211.51%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
11.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0425.HK's 74.35%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-62.82%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 788.71%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
283.50%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0425.HK's 148.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-96.14%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 37.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
204.83%
Similar net income/share CAGR to 0425.HK's 216.76%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
59.56%
Below 50% of 0425.HK's 130.21%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-27.41%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0425.HK is 66.20%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.98%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0425.HK invests at 104.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0425.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-32.62%
Inventory is declining while 0425.HK stands at 16.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-6.91%
Negative asset growth while 0425.HK invests at 5.69%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
6.12%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 3.97%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
62.93%
Debt growth far above 0425.HK's 45.32%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.04%
We cut SG&A while 0425.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.