PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.53%
Revenue growth of 1.53% while 0425.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
1.99%
Gross profit growth of 1.99% while 0425.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-6.32%
Negative EBIT growth while 0425.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.80%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
7.56%
Positive net income growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
7.45%
Positive EPS growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
7.45%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.52%
Slight or no buybacks while 0425.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.52%
Diluted share change of 0.52% while 0425.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-50.91%
Dividend reduction while 0425.HK stands at 0.40%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-79.42%
Negative OCF growth while 0425.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-89.03%
Negative FCF growth while 0425.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
53805.49%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0425.HK's 940.05%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
193.45%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0425.HK's 153.60%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
-14.66%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 51.07%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
1287.21%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with 0425.HK's 1307.82%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
347.63%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0425.HK's 84.95%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
202.92%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
314.20%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0425.HK's 505.35%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-1.05%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0425.HK is 77.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
148.76%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0425.HK's 19.44%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
199.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0425.HK's 56.78%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.59%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0425.HK invests at 66.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.27%
Inventory growth well above 0425.HK's 21.12%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-10.76%
Negative asset growth while 0425.HK invests at 10.33%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.50%
Under 50% of 0425.HK's 8.13%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
26.07%
Debt growth far above 0425.HK's 27.10%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.73%
SG&A growth of 0.73% while 0425.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.