Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Share count expansion well above 0425.HK's 0.16%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.

Diluted share count expanding well above 0425.HK's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.

Dividend reduction while 0425.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 146.65%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Negative 5Y CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 35.83%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 47.19%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK is at 85.20%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.

Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.

Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.

Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.

Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.

10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of 0425.HK's 151.97%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0425.HK is at 57.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0425.HK is at 24.74%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.

Cut dividends over 10 years while 0425.HK stands at 513.28%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.

Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 48.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.

Negative near-term dividend growth while 0425.HK invests at 1.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.

Inventory growth well above 0425.HK's 1.68%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.

Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.

Debt growth far above 0425.HK's 46.18%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.

Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.