Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)

Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Share count expansion well above 0425.HK's 0.53%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.

Diluted share count expanding well above 0425.HK's 0.46%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.

Dividend reduction while 0425.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 220.17%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Negative 5Y CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 53.82%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 82.10%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.

Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0425.HK is at 103.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0425.HK is 7.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.

10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0425.HK's 151.93%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0425.HK is at 54.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.

Cut dividends over 10 years while 0425.HK stands at 331.15%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.

Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 2.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.

Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.

Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.

Inventory growth well above 0425.HK's 9.92%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.

Negative asset growth while 0425.HK invests at 3.65%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.

Debt growth far above 0425.HK's 10.30%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.