PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-37.54%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-12.80%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
92.45%
Positive EBIT growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
92.43%
Positive operating income growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
82.70%
Positive net income growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
82.62%
Positive EPS growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
82.62%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73.32%
OCF growth under 50% of 0819.HK's 539.82%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
71.94%
FCF growth similar to 0819.HK's 75.38%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
24.92%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0819.HK's 253.81%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
24.92%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of 0819.HK's 30.23%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
24.92%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
46.64%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
46.64%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
46.64%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
65.40%
Below 50% of 0819.HK's 160.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
65.40%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
65.40%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.55%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.