PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Positive revenue growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.00%
Positive gross profit growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.00%
Positive EBIT growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-0.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-0.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
0.77%
Positive EPS growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
0.77%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
149.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0819.HK's 253.81%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
149.84%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 30.23%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
149.84%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-6.72%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-6.72%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-6.72%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
30.80%
Below 50% of 0819.HK's 160.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
30.80%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
30.80%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.25%
We expand SG&A while 0819.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.