PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
50.07%
Positive revenue growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-10.89%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-1059.04%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1059.06%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-36.72%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-34.78%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-34.78%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-118.36%
Negative OCF growth while 0819.HK is at 539.82%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-118.85%
Negative FCF growth while 0819.HK is at 75.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-55.48%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 253.81%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-64.36%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 30.23%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
21.73%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
85.56%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
72.93%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
55.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
83.18%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0819.HK's 160.15%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
51.38%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
60.94%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.39%
We expand SG&A while 0819.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.