0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth of 0.00% while 0819.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
0.00%
Gross profit growth of 0.00% while 0819.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
0.00%
EBIT growth of 0.00% while 0819.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
-0.00%
Negative operating income growth while 0819.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-512.90%
Negative EPS growth while 0819.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-512.90%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0819.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-71.49%
Share reduction while 0819.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-71.49%
Reduced diluted shares while 0819.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
212.35%
10Y CAGR of 212.35% while 0819.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
25.02%
5Y CAGR of 25.02% while 0819.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
327.01%
3Y CAGR of 327.01% while 0819.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
-1.34%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
5.04%
OCF/share CAGR of 5.04% while 0819.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-55.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-18.02%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0819.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-70.56%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0819.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-37.01%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0819.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.81%
We cut SG&A while 0819.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.