PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.69%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0819.HK's 81.81%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
27.08%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x 0819.HK's 21.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
-3.63%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-26.39%
Negative operating income growth while 0819.HK is at 13.99%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
3008.70%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0819.HK's 15.16%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
2827.27%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0819.HK's 10.34%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
2827.27%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0819.HK's 14.29%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
3.02%
Share count expansion well above 0819.HK's 2.03%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.02%
Diluted share count expanding well above 0819.HK's 0.68%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-52.42%
Dividend reduction while 0819.HK stands at 73.58%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
2536.42%
Positive OCF growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
1701.27%
Positive FCF growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
53271.44%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 555.32%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
189.85%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0819.HK's 305.63%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-15.26%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 301.73%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
5898.47%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
2081.08%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 30.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
604.15%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
300.18%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0819.HK's 224.64%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
-7.74%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0819.HK is 180.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-35.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0819.HK is 140.10%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.28%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 91.62%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.11%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0819.HK invests at 148.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0819.HK shows 50.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
1.95%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 0819.HK's 26.78%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
23.69%
Asset growth at 75-90% of 0819.HK's 26.68%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
-1.08%
We have a declining book value while 0819.HK shows 6.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-35.87%
We’re deleveraging while 0819.HK stands at 61.76%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-100.00%
Our R&D shrinks while 0819.HK invests at 48.28%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
34.88%
SG&A growth well above 0819.HK's 20.19%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.