PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.53%
Revenue growth of 1.53% while 0819.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
1.99%
Gross profit growth of 1.99% while 0819.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-6.32%
Negative EBIT growth while 0819.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.80%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
7.56%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0819.HK's 0.21%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
7.45%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0819.HK's 3.13%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
7.45%
Diluted EPS growth of 7.45% while 0819.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
0.52%
Slight or no buybacks while 0819.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.52%
Diluted share change of 0.52% while 0819.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-50.91%
Dividend reduction while 0819.HK stands at 1.22%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-79.42%
Negative OCF growth while 0819.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-89.03%
Negative FCF growth while 0819.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
53805.49%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 1226.64%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
193.45%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0819.HK's 310.59%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-14.66%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 306.64%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
1287.21%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
347.63%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 29.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
202.92%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
314.20%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0819.HK's 558.57%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-1.05%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0819.HK is 184.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
148.76%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to 0819.HK's 143.54%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
199.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 68.27%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.59%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0819.HK invests at 151.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.27%
Inventory growth well above 0819.HK's 37.02%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-10.76%
Negative asset growth while 0819.HK invests at 22.88%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.50%
Under 50% of 0819.HK's 16.63%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
26.07%
Debt growth far above 0819.HK's 22.19%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.73%
SG&A growth of 0.73% while 0819.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.