PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.83%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0819.HK's 19.73%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
2.90%
Positive gross profit growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
6.20%
Positive EBIT growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
35.35%
Positive operating income growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-19.07%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-9.25%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-5.78%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-10.94%
Share reduction while 0819.HK is at 2.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-14.43%
Reduced diluted shares while 0819.HK is at 0.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
349.14%
Dividend growth above 1.5x 0819.HK's 120.60%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-29.11%
Negative OCF growth while 0819.HK is at 602.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-271.62%
Negative FCF growth while 0819.HK is at 116.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
82239.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 676.42%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
44.10%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0819.HK's 308.26%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
12.96%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0819.HK's 209.10%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
565.21%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0819.HK's 472.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
-83.91%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK is at 38.78%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-64.35%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 1286.77%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
467.39%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-50.51%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-54.74%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.46%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 68.87%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.68%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 521.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-88.67%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0819.HK invests at 391.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.99%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.78%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
18.40%
Positive BV/share change while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-30.04%
We’re deleveraging while 0819.HK stands at 3.58%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.76%
We cut SG&A while 0819.HK invests at 20.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.