PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-14.52%
Negative revenue growth while 0819.HK stands at 30.35%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-5.64%
Negative gross profit growth while 0819.HK is at 18.74%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-43.49%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-40.57%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-82.23%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-80.89%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-82.21%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-7.43%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 0819.HK's 0.02%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
364.22%
OCF growth above 1.5x 0819.HK's 16.69%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
237.08%
Positive FCF growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
75929.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 1940.56%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
33.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0819.HK's 436.49%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
4.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0819.HK's 462.30%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
2432.89%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 1246.56%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-19.33%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK is at 63.25%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
78.77%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0819.HK's 1536.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
170.51%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
118.16%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
158.20%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
240.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 118.28%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
102.05%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 52.08%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-100.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.56%
Inventory growth well above 0819.HK's 1.89%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-2.91%
Negative asset growth while 0819.HK invests at 7.16%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
9.36%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 0819.HK's 2.44%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
24.71%
We have some new debt while 0819.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-71.23%
Our R&D shrinks while 0819.HK invests at 30.41%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
1.54%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0819.HK's 34.56%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.