PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.49%
Negative revenue growth while 0819.HK stands at 13.51%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-5.93%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-38.09%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-38.09%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-46.61%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-58.14%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-58.14%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
27.41%
Slight or no buybacks while 0819.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
27.49%
Slight or no buyback while 0819.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-60.86%
Negative OCF growth while 0819.HK is at 395.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-86.70%
Negative FCF growth while 0819.HK is at 195.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
60253.69%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 1875.79%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-22.50%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 505.61%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-3.23%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 168.64%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
1252.02%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0819.HK's 3031.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
382.08%
Below 50% of 0819.HK's 11226.67%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
1336.12%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 457.33%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
334.84%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
115.27%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
911.33%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
326.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 45.34%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
52.13%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 4.62%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-100.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-14.25%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
19.80%
We show growth while 0819.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-6.28%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-19.68%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-40.86%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-10.61%
Our R&D shrinks while 0819.HK invests at 96.06%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
1.66%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0819.HK's 16.56%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.