PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.56%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 0819.HK's 0.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
9.40%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0819.HK's 116.78%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
21.32%
EBIT growth below 50% of 0819.HK's 196.50%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
21.32%
Operating income growth under 50% of 0819.HK's 196.50%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
66.19%
Net income growth under 50% of 0819.HK's 176.55%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
67.59%
EPS growth under 50% of 0819.HK's 175.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
67.59%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 0819.HK's 175.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.74%
Share reduction while 0819.HK is at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.67%
Reduced diluted shares while 0819.HK is at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-166.08%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-816.18%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
47933.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 896.31%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
1.19%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0819.HK's 296.65%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.55%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0819.HK's 52.03%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-4802.15%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 1432.26%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-181.71%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK is at 3612.52%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-137.36%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 1432.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
387.58%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 145.83% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-73.88%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0819.HK is 53.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-43.89%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.38%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 70.86%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
54.75%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 8.78%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.59%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
141.46%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while 0819.HK cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
24.83%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. 0819.HK's 86.13%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-12.51%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
21.68%
Asset growth above 1.5x 0819.HK's 12.41%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.64%
Under 50% of 0819.HK's 9.84%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
281.70%
We have some new debt while 0819.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
75.26%
We increase R&D while 0819.HK cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
7.69%
We expand SG&A while 0819.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.