PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.48%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-23.42%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-78.76%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-78.76%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-98.53%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-98.40%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-98.40%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.03%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0819.HK's 0.67%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.00%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 0819.HK's 0.19%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
457531.89%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while 0819.HK cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
40.99%
Positive OCF growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
40.27%
Positive FCF growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-67.49%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 583.47%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-15.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 187.35%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-28.41%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 83.06%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-1697.85%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 244.93%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-72.92%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK is at 32.72%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
34.00%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-98.53%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0819.HK is at 979.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-96.55%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0819.HK is 79.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
100.61%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 9.64%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
38.18%
Below 50% of 0819.HK's 395.70%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
39.20%
Below 50% of 0819.HK's 201.44%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
20.11%
Below 50% of 0819.HK's 109.05%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-19.39%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-55.55%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.54%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0819.HK shows 0.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-10.88%
Inventory is declining while 0819.HK stands at 8.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.46%
Asset growth well under 50% of 0819.HK's 17.74%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.69%
Under 50% of 0819.HK's 2.07%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-2.75%
We’re deleveraging while 0819.HK stands at 82.84%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-3.46%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-13.08%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.