PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-26.84%
Negative revenue growth while 0819.HK stands at 17.67%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-32.02%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-46.07%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-46.07%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-92.78%
Negative net income growth while 0819.HK stands at 2.72%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-92.42%
Negative EPS growth while 0819.HK is at 2.53%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-92.54%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0819.HK is at 2.53%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.68%
Share reduction while 0819.HK is at 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.00%
Slight or no buyback while 0819.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
68.58%
Dividend growth above 1.5x 0819.HK's 17.45%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-13.62%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-10.58%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-76.95%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 638.52%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-60.58%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 153.49%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-45.66%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 39.04%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-239.91%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 60.41%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
39.42%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
3.16%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0819.HK's 92.53%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-98.14%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0819.HK is at 1834.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
132.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 56.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
107.44%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 41.93%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-6.40%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 0819.HK stands at 416.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-18.28%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0819.HK is at 181.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
0.48%
Below 50% of 0819.HK's 30.58%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-3.24%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0819.HK stands at 986.96%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
20.32%
Below 50% of 0819.HK's 74.63%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
86.50%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x 0819.HK's 20.29%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-29.36%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0819.HK shows 15.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
3.59%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 0819.HK's 33.19%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-11.27%
Negative asset growth while 0819.HK invests at 16.12%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.58%
Under 50% of 0819.HK's 1.56%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
26.20%
Debt shrinking faster vs. 0819.HK's 57.82%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-29.26%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-31.82%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.