PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Positive revenue growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.00%
Positive gross profit growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.01%
EBIT growth below 50% of 3606.HK's 2.95%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
0.00%
Positive operating income growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
OCF growth under 50% of 3606.HK's 59.49%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
0.00%
Positive FCF growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-40.67%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-52.50%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-43.82%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
257.34%
OCF/share CAGR of 257.34% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
394.87%
OCF/share CAGR of 394.87% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-60.50%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
75.39%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 75.39% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
28.87%
Net income/share CAGR of 28.87% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
85.67%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 85.67% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 3606.HK's 22.60%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.