0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
50.07%
Revenue growth similar to 3606.HK's 48.17%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
-10.89%
Negative gross profit growth while 3606.HK is at 48.70%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1059.04%
Negative EBIT growth while 3606.HK is at 77.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1059.06%
Negative operating income growth while 3606.HK is at 58.46%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-36.72%
Negative net income growth while 3606.HK stands at 23.48%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-34.78%
Negative EPS growth while 3606.HK is at 28.45%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-34.78%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 3606.HK is at 28.45%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-118.36%
Negative OCF growth while 3606.HK is at 5.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-118.85%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-55.48%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-64.36%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
21.73%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 3606.HK's 180.26%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
85.56%
OCF/share CAGR of 85.56% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
72.93%
OCF/share CAGR of 72.93% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
55.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 55.81% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
83.18%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 83.18% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
51.38%
Net income/share CAGR of 51.38% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
60.94%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of 3606.HK's 99.13%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.39%
SG&A growth well above 3606.HK's 51.65%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.