PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth under 50% of 3606.HK's 8.98%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-285.03%
Negative EBIT growth while 3606.HK is at 12.45%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.93%
Negative EPS growth while 3606.HK is at 0.25%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-114.93%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 3606.HK is at 0.25%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
135.43%
Share change of 135.43% while 3606.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
135.43%
Diluted share change of 135.43% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.21%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-12.15%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
60.03%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 3606.HK's 121.08%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
65.71%
OCF/share CAGR of 65.71% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-108.61%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
74.18%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 3606.HK's 548.32%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
165.46%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 165.46% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
138.12%
Net income/share CAGR of 138.12% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
243.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 3606.HK's 86.89%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
344.28%
SG&A growth well above 3606.HK's 44.38%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.