0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17045.22%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 5.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
4822.56%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 19.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
100.00%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 46.07%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
323.00%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 52.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
237.25%
Net income growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 60.25%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
913.95%
EPS growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 63.93%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
913.95%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 63.93%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
18.11%
Slight or no buybacks while 3606.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
18.11%
Diluted share change of 18.11% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
698.72%
Positive OCF growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-57.51%
Negative FCF growth while 3606.HK is at 40.24%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
6634.46%
10Y CAGR of 6634.46% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
18313.37%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3606.HK's 331.14%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
22601.64%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3606.HK's 76.73%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
186.90%
OCF/share CAGR of 186.90% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
365.85%
OCF/share CAGR of 365.85% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
10.46%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 3606.HK's 8.05%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
193.46%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 193.46% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
316.98%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to 3606.HK's 338.86%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
859.55%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 3606.HK's 104.92%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
367.08%
We expand SG&A while 3606.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.