PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.16%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.57%
Negative EPS growth while 3606.HK is at 8.33%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-0.57%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 3606.HK is at 8.33%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.24%
Slight or no buybacks while 3606.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.24%
Diluted share change of 0.24% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13337.02%
10Y CAGR of 13337.02% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
18269.76%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3606.HK's 287.05%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
22547.88%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3606.HK's 137.55%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
273.40%
OCF/share CAGR of 273.40% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
365.22%
OCF/share CAGR of 365.22% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
10.20%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
286.47%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 286.47% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
316.47%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to 3606.HK's 335.77%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
857.76%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 3606.HK's 196.21%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.65%
We cut SG&A while 3606.HK invests at 46.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.