PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
197.53%
Positive operating income growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-152.30%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-152.37%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-152.37%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33031.30%
10Y CAGR of 33031.30% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
57042.15%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3606.HK's 134.76%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
10507.16%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3606.HK's 47.85%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
3940.88%
OCF/share CAGR of 3940.88% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
2991.96%
Positive OCF/share growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
3890.15%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-77.18%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 3606.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-288.23%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-50.12%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.