0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
39.05%
Revenue growth similar to 3606.HK's 40.44%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
12.90%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 3606.HK's 73.33%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-9.94%
Negative EBIT growth while 3606.HK is at 19.18%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-81.41%
Negative operating income growth while 3606.HK is at 17.75%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
251.72%
Net income growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 13.85%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
251.20%
EPS growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 13.80%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
251.20%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 13.80%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1004.54%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while 3606.HK cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-119.58%
Negative OCF growth while 3606.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-155.91%
Negative FCF growth while 3606.HK is at 13.22%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
22933.94%
10Y CAGR of 22933.94% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
77546.68%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3606.HK's 115.71%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
20989.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3606.HK's 47.98%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-275.97%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 3606.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-577.90%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-831.50%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
234.41%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 234.41% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
1192.37%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
74.43%
Positive short-term CAGR while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.02%
Inventory is declining while 3606.HK stands at 4.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
26.81%
Asset growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 1.92%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-7.19%
We have a declining book value while 3606.HK shows 3.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
31.29%
We have some new debt while 3606.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.29%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 3606.HK's 29.83%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.