0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.46%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 2.88%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-114.93%
Negative net income growth while 3606.HK stands at 5.73%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-114.99%
Negative EPS growth while 3606.HK is at 4.55%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-114.99%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 3606.HK is at 4.55%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16816.68%
10Y CAGR of 16816.68% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
13431.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3606.HK's 191.58%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
214.53%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 3606.HK's 62.27%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1724.05%
OCF/share CAGR of 1724.05% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
1810.30%
Positive OCF/share growth while 3606.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
899.55%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 899.55% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
20.09%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 20.09% while 3606.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
53.15%
Below 50% of 3606.HK's 508.01%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-129.65%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 3606.HK is 80.52%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.51%
Inventory growth well above 3606.HK's 2.82%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
9.93%
Asset growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 5.63%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.05%
50-75% of 3606.HK's 8.79%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
79.24%
We have some new debt while 3606.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.